Prediction of Evan Furness [879th] vs Antoine Hoang [778th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L L L L
Form
L L W W L W L L L LH2H: Furness 3 - 3 Hoang
They have played 15 sets in total, with Furness winning 8 and Hoang winning 7. The last match between Furness and Hoang was at the M15 Grenoble, 09-02-2024, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Antoine Hoang getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Evan Furness | 3 |
| Antoine Hoang | 3 |
| Furness | Stats | Hoang |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-3) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 3 |
| 879 | Ranking | 778 |
| 197 | Highest Rank | 98 |
| 26 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 7 |
| 58% (291-210) | Career Total W/L | 58% (388-285) |
| $5,730 | Career Prize Money | $522,575 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 2 |
| 3 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Antoine Hoang
Player
Evan Furness
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-6(4) |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Antoine Hoang
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Antoine Hoang
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Antoine Hoang
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
4
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 5-7 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Evan Furness
56%
(
63 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
3
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 3 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 7 |
| 72 | Games Won | 81 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 30 |
| 25 | Total Double Faults | 25 |
| 2:2:33 | Average Match Time | 2:2:33 |
| 66% (321/489) | 1st Serve % | 64% (326/507) |
| 70% (226/321) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (223/326) |
| 40% (68/168) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (83/181) |
| 36% (17/47) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (24/53) |
| 40% (201/507) | Return Points Win % | 40% (195/489) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Evan Furness vs Antoine Hoang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Furness 3 - 3 Hoang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Furness has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Hoang has won 43.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Furness, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hoang has won 55.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Furness has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hoang has saved 54.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Furness has won 29.41% of matches played (W/L 5/ 12), with Hoang winning 36.84% (W/L 7/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hoang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 141/ 100), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 63/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 3/ 6), where as Hoang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.18% of matches (W/L 7/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Furness winning 3 times and Hoang being victorious 3 times. They have played 15 sets in total, with Furness winning 8 and Hoang winning 7. The last match between Furness and Hoang was at the M15 Grenoble, 09-02-2024, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Antoine Hoang getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:33.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Furness and Hoang have played a deciding set 3 times, with Furness winning 1 times and Hoang 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Furness winning 3, and Hoang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Furness has played against opponents with an average rank of 387.12 while Hoang has played against players with an average rank of 446.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Furness has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hoang has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Furness has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hoang has converted 45.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Evan Furness
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Evan Furness
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
114)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
114)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Evan Furness
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
57 of
72)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Evan Furness
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
77 of
127)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
59 of
127)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Dan Added
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Oscar Lacides
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Evan Furness
42%
(
38 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Antoine Hoang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Antoine Hoang
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Antoine Hoang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
58
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Antoine Hoang
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Antoine Hoang
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Ignasi Forcano
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Antoine Hoang
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Milan Welte
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
12
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Nicolas Colne
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Antoine Hoang
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Furness vs Hoang?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Furness Vs Hoang is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (291/210) | Win/Loss | 58% (388/285) |
| 57% (642/487) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (907/694) |
| 53% (5556/4949) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (8033/7259) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1171 | Aces Total | 1825 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1458 | Total Double Faults | 1800 |
| 1:25:48 | Average Match Time | 1:27:25 |
| 483.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 503.35 |
| 62% (18886/30648) | 1st Serve % | 68% (26547/38989) |
| 67% (12685/18886) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (18316/26547) |
| 49% (5759/11763) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6278/12442) |
| 45% (1462/3221) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1629/3789) |
| 42% (12589/30274) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15725/39779) |
| 59% (285/485) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (376/654) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 58% (7/12) |
| 51% (69/134) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (116/229) |
| 54% (75/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (114/244) |
| 87% (286/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (372/313) |
| 13% (286/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (372/57) |
| 20% (215/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (301/73) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
